← Back to all briefings

Shutdown, Minneapolis, Tariffs, Fed, Epstein, Lemon & Minnesota

January 31, 2026

Table of Contents

Key Updates

The Government Shuts Down Over an Immigration War

As anticipated, a partial government shutdown is now underway. Congress has managed to pass funding for most of the government through September, but the core conflict remains unresolved: the Department of Homeland Security (). The Senate, led by Chuck Schumer, carved funding out of the main package, granting it only a two-week extension. This move is a direct result of the fatal shootings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good by federal agents in Minneapolis, which we've been tracking. Democrats are leveraging the funding deadline to demand significant new restrictions and oversight on and .

The White House and President Trump agreed to this two-week punt, likely seeing it as the only way to avoid a full, prolonged shutdown. However, because the House, under Speaker Mike Johnson, was already in recess, they couldn't vote on the Senate's changes. So, we have a temporary, weekend shutdown at minimum. The real fight is just delayed by two weeks, at which point the same battle over immigration enforcement will resume, but with even higher stakes. Complicating matters, Senator Lindsey Graham threw a wrench in the works by objecting to parts of the bill, demanding a vote on sanctuary cities.

Analytical Take: This isn't a typical budget squabble. It's a proxy war over the soul of federal law enforcement and immigration policy. The Minneapolis shootings provided Democrats with the political ammunition they needed to draw a hard line. Kicking the can down the road for two weeks solves nothing; it just concentrates all the political pressure onto a single point of failure: funding. Trump is caught between his base, which demands aggressive enforcement, and the political reality of a Democratic Senate willing to shut down his security apparatus to stop it. This sets up a major political collision in mid-February.

The Minneapolis Tinderbox: Protests, Investigations, and a Cornered Secretary

The situation in Minneapolis continues to spiral, acting as the epicenter for the national conflict over immigration. Following the shootings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, nationwide protests organized by a coalition of student and far-left groups under the banner "National Shutdown" took place yesterday. While the overall disruption was moderate, clashes in Los Angeles saw federal agents deploy pepper spray and tear gas.

The key development is that the has now officially taken over the investigation into the Pretti shooting from , with the 's Civil Rights Division also participating. This is a significant move. It signals that the case is being treated not just as a standard agent-involved shooting, but as a potential federal civil rights violation. This directly ratchets up the pressure on Secretary Kristi Noem, who, as reported yesterday, was already facing calls for her resignation. Now, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is openly threatening impeachment proceedings. In response, Trump has publicly labeled Pretti an "agitator" and "possible insurrectionist," digging in to defend his administration's actions.

Analytical Take: Handing the investigation to the is the White House trying to appear impartial while also taking the matter out of the hands of , which is seen as compromised. It's a classic crisis management play. However, it won't quell the political storm. The narrative is set: progressive states and activists see as a rogue agency, and Noem is the face of it. The "National Shutdown" protests are less about immediate impact and more about building sustained political pressure. The fight over Noem's job and the outcome of the probe will become defining issues for the administration's second term. Meanwhile, states like California and New York aren't waiting, moving ahead with legislation to functionally kneecap operations within their borders, creating a full-blown federalism crisis.

Trump Escalates Economic Warfare on Two Fronts

While battling fires at home, President Trump is also igniting them abroad. He's now threatening Canada with a massive 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft, a direct retaliation for Canada's refusal to certify US-made Gulfstream jets and its deepening economic ties with China. This is a significant escalation in trade tensions with a key ally, moving beyond general disputes into targeted, punitive measures.

Simultaneously, Trump has declared a national emergency regarding Cuba. This isn't just rhetoric; it empowers him to impose tariffs on countries that supply oil to the island, with Mexico being the primary target. The official justification is Cuba's alleged support for hostile actors and terrorist groups. This move puts Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum in a difficult position, caught between US pressure and regional alliances. Senator Marco Rubio, a key hawk on this issue, is closely monitoring the situation.

Analytical Take: This is the "maximum pressure" doctrine from yesterday's brief, now fully in motion. The moves against Canada and Cuba/Mexico are two sides of the same coin: using US economic leverage as a primary tool of foreign policy, consequences be damned. The Canada tariff is a classic tit-for-tat trade spat, but the 50% figure is designed for shock value and to force a concession. The Cuba emergency is more strategic, aiming to collapse the Cuban economy by cutting off its energy lifeline, and in doing so, testing the loyalty of regional partners like Mexico. This is hardball geopolitics that risks fracturing North American trade and creating instability on the US doorstep.

The Fed Gets a New, Trump-Friendly Boss

In a move that will reshape US economic policy, President Trump has nominated Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Powell's term ends in May, and Trump has been relentlessly criticizing him for not cutting interest rates fast enough. Warsh, a former Fed governor, is seen as someone who will be far more aligned with the White House's desire for aggressive monetary stimulus.

This isn't a done deal. Warsh faces Senate confirmation, and his nomination is complicated by an ongoing Justice Department probe involving the Fed. While markets have reacted with cautious optimism at the prospect of lower rates, there are significant concerns about the erosion of the Fed's political independence. Warsh himself has a history of being a policy hawk, but he seems to have shifted his tune to align with Trump's dovish demands.

Analytical Take: Trump isn't just choosing a new chair; he's attempting a hostile takeover of the central bank's philosophy. The primary qualification for the job appears to be loyalty to the President's economic agenda. This nomination is a direct assault on the post-Volcker tradition of an independent Fed that acts as a check on political impulses. If confirmed, Warsh would likely face a credibility crisis from day one. The key question is whether he would actually follow through on Trump's demands or attempt to reassert some independence once in the chair. His confirmation hearing will be a crucial test of his intentions and the Senate's appetite for politicizing monetary policy.

The Epstein Files Drop, Unleashing Calculated Chaos

The Justice Department has finally released over 3 million pages of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, complying with a law Trump signed last year. The files name numerous prominent individuals, including Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Prince Andrew, and Cantor Fitzgerald Howard Lutnick, detailing their connections to Epstein. The documents consist of everything from flight logs and emails to unverified, anonymous tips.

The release has immediately sparked controversy. Several named individuals, like Musk and Lutnick, are vehemently denying the extent of their relationships or ever visiting Epstein's island. The story is now as much about the nature of the document dump as its content. The files are heavily redacted in places, and the inclusion of unsubstantiated allegations—including some against President Trump himself—makes it difficult to separate fact from fiction.

Analytical Take: This is not a clean, transparent disclosure. It's a strategic data dump designed to create maximum chaos while maintaining plausible deniability. Releasing everything, including unverified tips, muddies the water and allows anyone implicated to dismiss the credible evidence by pointing to the baseless claims. The redactions protect sources and ongoing investigations (or so the claims), but they also fuel conspiracy theories about what's being hidden. The real fallout won't be immediate legal action, but a protracted war of public relations and a permanent stain on the reputations of many involved. This release ensures the Epstein saga will continue to poison the well of American public life for years to come.

Journalist Don Lemon Arrested in Church Protest Case

In a move that blurs the line between journalism and activism, former CNN host Don Lemon was arrested by federal agents in Los Angeles. The charges stem from his involvement in an anti- protest that disrupted a church service in St. Paul, Minnesota, earlier this month. The DOJ, reportedly at the direction of Attorney General Pam Bondi, is charging him with conspiracy to deprive churchgoers of their rights and violating the Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which also protects places of worship).

Lemon and his high-profile lawyer, Abbe Lowell, claim he was there as a journalist, livestreaming the event. The government's case, however, alleges he was an active co-conspirator. This arrest has ignited a firestorm, with press freedom groups decrying it as political targeting, while the White House maintains that no one is above the law.

Analytical Take: This is a major escalation in the administration's war with the media. The government is making a high-stakes bet that they can prove Lemon crossed the line from observer to participant. If they succeed, it could have a chilling effect on how journalists cover protests, forcing them to keep a significant distance for fear of being charged as co-conspirators. If they fail, it will look like a blatant, politically motivated prosecution of a media figure critical of the administration. The choice to use the Act is particularly aggressive. This case is now a crucial test for the First Amendment in a hyper-partisan era.

Minnesota Politics in Upheaval

The political landscape in Minnesota has been completely upended. As reported yesterday, the state was already reeling from the crisis. Now, Governor Tim Walz has announced he will not seek re-election and will retire from politics entirely. He's citing the fallout from a massive, $9 billion fraud scandal that has plagued his administration, as well as the recent turmoil over federal immigration enforcement.

Almost immediately, Senator Amy Klobuchar announced she is leaving the Senate to run for governor, quickly racking up endorsements from national Democrats like Pete Buttigieg.

Analytical Take: Walz's exit is a political surrender. The combination of a colossal fraud scandal under his watch and the explosive situation in Minneapolis made re-election untenable. This creates a power vacuum that Klobuchar is moving swiftly to fill. Her entry nationalizes the race and makes it a must-win for Democrats. For Klobuchar, this is a strategic retreat from a deadlocked D.C. to a powerful executive position back home. The election will be a referendum on the converging crises of government incompetence (the fraud) and federal overreach (the operations).


Noteworthy Items

Trump Sues His Own Treasury Department

In a move that is both legally audacious and politically theatrical, President Trump and his family are suing the Treasury Department and the for $10 billion. The lawsuit alleges the agencies failed to prevent a former contractor, Charles Littlejohn, from leaking his tax returns back in 2019. Littlejohn was convicted and sentenced for the crime, but Trump is now seeking damages from the government itself for reputational and financial harm. It's the highly unusual spectacle of a sitting president suing his own administration. Analytical Take: This is classic Trump. It serves multiple purposes: it keeps the "deep state" narrative alive, it attempts to frame him as a victim, and it puts the on the defensive regarding data security. It's less about the legal merits and more about generating headlines and reinforcing his political brand.

California's Gubernatorial Race Gets Crowded

San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan has jumped into the 2026 race for California governor, positioning himself as a moderate, common-sense Democrat. He joins a field that already includes progressives Katie Porter and Eric Swalwell. This sets up a classic Democratic primary battle, but with a twist: the sheer number of Democrats could split the vote in the June primary, potentially allowing a Republican like Steve Hilton or Chad Bianco to sneak into the top-two runoff. Analytical Take: The California Democratic party is so dominant that its biggest threat is itself. Mahan's entry highlights the deep fissure between the party's pragmatic, business-friendly wing and its activist progressive base. If they can't coalesce, they risk a political accident of their own making, which would have national repercussions.

Severe Weather Batters the U.S.

A series of brutal weather events and related accidents are causing significant disruption. Severe winter storms have knocked out power for tens of thousands in Mississippi and Tennessee. The East Coast is bracing for a potential "bomb cyclone" and is already experiencing a deep freeze that has tragically led to the deaths of at least 13 homeless individuals in New York City. Separately, a fatal car crash in Colorado killed a parent from a visiting youth hockey team, and an explosion at a metal plant in Pennsylvania caused multiple injuries. Analytical Take: This is a grim reminder of the fragility of infrastructure and the vulnerability of certain populations during extreme weather. The rising death toll among the homeless in , despite being a sanctuary city with a right-to-shelter policy, highlights a systemic failure that gets brutally exposed when temperatures plummet.

Murder Suspect Luigi Mangione Avoids Death Penalty

In the case of Luigi Mangione, the man accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare Brian Thompson in 2024, a federal judge has taken the death penalty off the table by dismissing related firearms charges. However, the judge ruled that key evidence found in Mangione's backpack at the time of his arrest is admissible. The case continues to have bizarre elements, with a man named Mark Anderson recently arrested for attempting to break Mangione out of jail. Analytical Take: The removal of the death penalty simplifies the prosecution's path to a conviction, as they no longer need a unanimous jury decision on execution. The case remains a lightning rod for anger over the healthcare industry, and the attempted jailbreak suggests Mangione has become a folk hero to a fringe element.

A Fond Farewell to a Comedy Legend

On a final, sadder note, the world lost a comedic icon. Catherine O'Hara, the beloved actress from Schitt's Creek, Home Alone, and countless other classics, has died at the age of 71 after a brief illness. Tributes are pouring in from across Hollywood, including from her Home Alone son, Macaulay Culkin. Her passing marks the end of an era for a generation that grew up with her uniquely brilliant and quirky performances.

Shutdown, Minneapolis, Tariffs, Fed, Epstein, Lemon & Minnesota | The Updates